Legal Opinion
Nuessen v. Sutherlands
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided June 12, 2015No. 111417PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Schroeder, J.:
In this appeal, the heirs of Leslie Francis Nues-sen (Nuessen) claim the Workers Compensation Board (the Board) erred in denying their demand for penalties and attorney fees pursuant to K.S.A. 44-512a(a) because Sutherlands and Lumbermen’s Underwriting Alliance (Sutherlands) failed to pay the workers compensation benefits ordered by the Board. In tire alternative, they argue that Sutherlands failed to obtain a stay pursuant to K.S.A. 77-616 to stop the payment of those benefits pending an appeal to this court. We agree with Nuessen. Thus, we reverse and remand this matter to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fort Hays State University v. Fort Hays State University ChapterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Cady v. SchrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- Sierra Club v. MoserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Brennan v. Kansas Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Friends of Bethany Place, Inc. v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clayton v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2017
- Pierson v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
- Aikins v. Gates Copr.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- King v. Casey's General StoresCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2019
- Mera-Hernandez v. U.S.D. 233Supreme Court of Kansas · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.