Burbank v. Stevens
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.
The errors of the trial court with regard to its refusal to strike out the paragraphs of the finding which are attacked in the first reason of appeal as being found without evidence, are not apparent. The evidence attached to the finding as exhibits shows that the court had competent evidence to support the facts found. The claim for the substitution of a paragraph as above noted is placed on the ground that it “is supported by the evidence, and said correction is material.” This is not a ground upon which the correction can be made. There should have been an allegation that the finding of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. . FunkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Innes v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Main's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
- Meriden Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Guinan's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kriedel v. KrampitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Linahan v. LinahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Cramer v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Hanley Co., Inc. v. American Cement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Hebrew University Assn. v. NyeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.