Legal Opinion
United States v. Punn
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 6, 2013No. Docket No. 13-2780-crPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge:
This appeal requires us to decide whether an order denying a motion to quash grand jury subpoenas directed at third parties on the ground that the subpoenas were issued for the sole or dominant purpose of preparing for the movant’s trial on a pending indictment is an immediately appealable order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Although this Court has addressed this issue on a number of occasions, our case law does not reflect a uniform approach to addressing that question, or a consistent answer. We conclude that such orders are not immediately appealable.
BACKGROUND
Appel…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Myers v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, New York, Inc. v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Microsoft Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Jones v. Cty. of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- USA v. USCC Wireless Investment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
- In re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated March 2, 2015Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.