Legal Opinion

Ly v. Heu

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 18, 2003No. CIV.A.03-3415DSD/SRNPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DOTY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court upon petitioner’s motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to alter or amend the judgment to enforce petitioner’s right of access to his daughter, Sandie Nhia Yi Ly. Because the court finds that it lacks jurisdiction to grant the requested relief, petitioner’s motion is denied.

BACKGROUND

This is an action for the return of Sandie Nhia Yi Ly, a minor child, brought by Sandie’s father under the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (“ICARA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 11601-11610. Following a bench trial, the court announced its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bromley v. BromleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Teijeiro Fernandez v. YeagerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
  3. Wiggill v. JanickiDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sarah Claudia Aragon Cantor v. Andrew CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. In RE APPLICATION OF ADAMS EX REL. NAIK v. NaikDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  3. Wiezel v. Wiezel-TyrnauerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Aubert, Yves v. Poast, LaurieDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2025
  5. Cantor v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API