Legal Opinion

Bromley v. Bromley

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1998No. 2:98-cv-00180PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Petitioner, Robert Paul Bromley resides in England and has brought this action pursuant to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of October 25,1980, and the United States Congress in the International Child Abduction Remedies Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 11601-11610. Petitioner now asks this court for various forms of relief concerning his rights of visitation and custody of his children who reside with the Respondent, Christine Frances Bromley, in the United States. We held oral argument with both counsel present…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich, David Harper and Shirley HarperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. FloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Chan v. Korean Air Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Edward M. Feder v. Melissa Ann Evans-FederCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sarah Claudia Aragon Cantor v. Andrew CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. Eduardo Arce Gonzalez v. Rosa Teresa Gutierrez, Eduardo Arce Gonzalez v. Rosa Teresa GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. In Re Vernor, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  4. Lieberman v. TabachnikDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2008
  5. Teijeiro Fernandez v. YeagerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API