Legal Opinion

Lemonis v. Hogue

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1952No. 38348PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Appellee brought suit against appellant for slander and recovered a judgment for $2000 actual damages and $1000 punitive damages. Appellant contends that he was entitled to a peremptory instruction which was refused by the trial court.

*780The declaration charges that appellant made the following charge against appellee: “That fellow Lloyd Hogue stole $300.00 in cash from under my cash register this morning and I’m going to have him arrested.” Words which accuse a person of being a thief are actionable per se, Valley Dry Goods Co. v. Buford, 114 Miss. 414, 427, 75 So. 252. To sustain a charge of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Valley Dry Goods Co. v. BufordMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Jones v. EdwardsMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  3. C.I.T. Corporation v. CorreroMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Baldwin Piano Co. v. JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Speed v. ScottMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Baugh v. BaughMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. TRAVIS v. HuntMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Harold Speed v. Robert E. ScottMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Harold Speed v. Robert E. ScottMississippi Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API