Valley Dry Goods Co. v. Buford
Mississippi Supreme Court
Appeal from the circuit court of Warren county. Hon. E. L. Brten, Judge. •Action by Olive Buford, by next friend, against the Yalley Dry Good Gompany. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court. Since writing our-reply brief, we have bad access in tbe state library to tbe Pennsylvania decisions.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the circuit court of Warren county. Hon. E. L. Brten, Judge. •Action by Olive Buford, by next friend, against the Yalley Dry Good Gompany. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court. Since writing our-reply brief, we have bad access in tbe state library to tbe Pennsylvania decisions. The first decision in this court was rendered in 1808, being Kennedy v. Lowry, 1 Binn. 393: “The reasons urged in support of the appeal are two: First, that the declaration contains five counts, in four of which it is alleged that the…
1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.
Olive Buford, the appellee, a minor, was employed to work in the store of the appellant, a dry goods establishment or department store. She alleged that on or about the 10th of March, 1915, she was called to the office of the manager, and by the manager of the company with some detectives who had been employed by the appellant she was asked as to her financial condition and the finan*424cial condition of her people, and was then and there charged by the appellant with stealing a sum of money out of a cash transaction in the store, saying that the plaintiff was working as a partner in the theft…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Speed v. ScottMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- Chalk v. BertholfCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
- Holland v. KennedyMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Boler v. MosbyMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
- TRAVIS v. HuntMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.