Legal Opinion

State v. Shoemake

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 1990No. 57060PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Defendant, Estel E. Shoemake, appeals after conviction on misdemeanor charge of exceeding the speed limit in violation of Section 304.010 RSMo 1986. The court imposed a fine of $15.00 and costs.

Defendant contends: (1) there was insufficient evidence to sustain or support the court’s finding of guilty; and (2) his constitutional rights were violated because he was placed in double jeopardy and not given the opportunity to confront witnesses.

Defendant was court tried on May 15, 1989. Evidence supportive of the trial court’s decision showed that on November 13, 1988, at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. City of Kansas City v. OxleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. State v. StevensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. State v. CalvertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. State v. IrvingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Springfield v. WaddellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. RawlinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API