Legal Opinion

Fratessa v. Roffy

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1919No. Civ. No. 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The action was brought by the assignee to foreclose a mortgage on land located in Sacramento County. The written obligation to secure which the mortgage was given was as follows:

"$1500.00 Oakland, Calif. Oct 26th, 1907.
"On or before two years after date I promise to pay Geo. L. Woodford, or order, the sum of Fifteen Hundred Dollars, Gold Coin of the United States, with interest at the rate of one per cent per month from and after maturity, value received. If the principal and interest, or either shall not be paid when due then the whole of the said indebtedness shall be due and collectible at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Coyle v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Sexton v. PickettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Schadt v. HeppeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chin v. Advanced Fresh Concepts Franchise Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Seale v. BerrymanArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Johnson v. Home Owners' Loan Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Whittell v. PinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API