Leonia Amusement Corp. v. Loew's Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
Motion by plaintiffs for an order pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. requiring certain of the corporate defendants to produce and permit plaintiffs to inspect and copy certain documents claimed to be in the possession of defendants.
This action is brought pursuant to an' act of Congress known as the “Sherman Anti-Trust Act.” 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 through 7, 15 note and the act of Congress known as the “Clayton Act.” 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 12 through 27.
Briefly, the complaint alleges that the defendants conspired against plaintiffs in violation of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hillside Amusement Co. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- Burroughs v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1952
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Carlson Companies, Inc. v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1974
- Leonia Amusement Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Goldinger v. Boron Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Bass v. Gulf Oil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.