Legal Opinion

Oleksik v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1934No. Docket No. 27, Calendar No. 37,707PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the department of labor and industry granting plaintiff compensation at the rate of $12.80 per week. Appellant’s brief does not contain a statement of the questions involved, as required by Court Buie No. 67 (1933). We quote the statement of facts from appellant’s brief:

“Ludwig Oleksik and family had been accepting welfare from the city of Detroit for months prior to September 19, 1931. September 19, 1931, in compliance with instructions issued to him by the welfare department, he presented himself for work and began to work as a wage-earner with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vaivida v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. McLaughlin v. Antrim County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Markey v. S. S. Peter & Paul's ParishMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Scordis's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Oswalt v. Lucas CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Lawrence v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Wagner v. Ontonagon County Emergency Welfare Relief CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API