Legal Opinion

Wright v. Barringer

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 15, 1931No. 13147PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

When this case was called in this Court for the hearing of the appeal, counsel for appellants presented a motion, of which due notice had been given respondent’s attorneys, asking the Court for an order dismissing the action upon the grounds set forth in the notice of the motion.

After argument on the motion, judgment was reserved; and argument of the appeal in the main case was heard. We will dispose of both matters in this opinion.

First, then, as to the motion to dismiss the action: This is predicated upon these grounds: That the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Branchville Motor Co. v. AddenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  2. Fischer v. ChisholmSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  3. White v. Commercial & Farmers' BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. Man v. BoykinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  5. Shaw v. FaireySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A.M. Law Co., Inc. v. ClevelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  2. Brice v. ClevelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  3. Cox v. BellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API