Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony T. Santos, Anthony C. Cepeda, Tito Naputi, David Lujan, Vicente M. Santos, Pedro Q. Salas, Juan Q. Salas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1979No. 77-3018, 77-3019, 77-3020, 77-3021, 77-3022, 77-3105 and 77-3106PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants, correctional officers and supervisors at the Guam Territorial Prison, were convicted of depriving certain prisoners of their civil rights in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242 and of being accessories after the fact, 18 U.S.C. § 3. Appellants were sentenced and then filed timely notices of appeal.

The facts of this case are in some dispute but may be summarized as follows. On Sunday morning, February 29, 1976, eleven prisoners at the Guam Penitentiary refused to immediately return to their cells after religious services. These prisoners then barricaded themselves in the “North Dormitory”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. Billy Edward Davis, Sr., and Dennis Bates FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United States v. Clarence Christian NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Eduardo Jaime RoucoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Patrick G. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API