Legal Opinion

Schick v. 200 Blydenburgh, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 2011PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant Pal Supply Corp. (hereinafter Pal Supply) entered into a lease for the subject premises with the defendant 200 Blydenburgh, LLC (hereinafter 200 Blydenburgh), on March 1, 2007, to be effective as of that date. The subject premises consist of a warehouse and a small office space.

On March 9, 2007, the date of the subject accident, Pal Supply had not yet moved into the premises. That morning, the injured plaintiff (hereinafter the plaintiff), a field technician for Verizon, was assigned to provide telephone service for Pal Supply at the warehouse. According to the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Singh v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Gunderman v. Sure Connect Cable Installation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Kochman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Gunderman v. Sure Connect Cable Installation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Kochman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API