Legal Opinion

Gunderman v. Sure Connect Cable Installation, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

Egan Jr.,

*1216Initially, we reject Sure Connect’s contention that Supreme Court abused its discretion in granting plaintiffs’ motion to reargue. The crux of plaintiffs’ argument in this regard was that Supreme Court misapplied this Court’s then recent decision in Randall v Time Warner Cable, Inc. (81 AD3d 1149 [2011]) and, upon further deliberation, Supreme Court agreed. Contrary to Sure Connect’s assertion, there is nothing in the record to suggest that Supreme Court considered new facts in deciding the motion; indeed, Supreme Court expressly noted that it was precluded from doing so. Under these…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Joblon v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Weininger v. Hagedorn & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Smith v. Shell Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Lewis-Moors v. Contel of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API