Legal Opinion

Pohlman v. Wilcox

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1905No. L.A. No. 1672PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

This is a suit to recover the sum of five hundred dollars, with interest, alleged to he due from the defendants on a written contract. The defendants had judgment, from which and from an order denying his motion for new trial the plaintiff appeals.

The case is: The defendants were under contract to construct a certain building for the government of the United States, and one Craig had contracted with them to furnish the stone for it for the sum of twenty-seven hundred dollars. Craig assigned to the plaintiff “all of [his] interest in the last payment to be made to [him] under the . .…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. GaribaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Tatsuno v. PedersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Henry v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Ward v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  5. Ward v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API