Legal Opinion

Fusco v. Shannon

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 20, 2013No. 2819PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHotten, J.

Following the death of Anthony Fusco, Sr. (“Mr. Fusco”), appellants, Mafalda Fusco and the surviving children, filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County against appellees, Kevin Shannon, M.D. (“Dr. Shannon”) and his practice, Hematology-Oncology Consultants, P.A. (“H.O. Consultants”). Appellants alleged that Dr. Shannon failed to obtain Mr. Fusco’s informed consent regarding the risks associated with the administered drug, Amifostine. Appellants further contended that the direct and proximate result of appellees’ failure caused Mr. Fusco to sustain injuries and…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  3. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. BalbosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shannon v. FuscoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Shannon v. FuscoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API