Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Shepard

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Osage Elstrict Court. ACTION brought by McDonald against Shepard and others, to foreclose a vendor’s lien upon real estate. The nature of the action, and the facts, appear in the opinion. Trial by the court, July 19, 1879, and judgment for defendants Shepard & Waldo, against the plaintiff, for costs. The plaintiff brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HobtoN, C. J.:

Action brought by Joseph McDonald against L. J. Sawyer, H. D. Shepard, Daphne Shepard, C. D. Waldo, Abbie E. Waldo, J. H. Burke, R. H. Baird', B. *113P. Seymour, and William G. Lucas, and H. D. Shepard and C. D. Waldo, late partners as H. D. Shepard & Co., and H. D. Shepard and C. D. Waldo, late partners as Shepard & Waldo. The petition alleged substantially the following facts:

That on the 27th day of July, 1875, the plaintiff agreed to and did sell to L. J. Sawyer the west half of lot fourteen, in block thirty-five, in Burlingame, Osage…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Branch Railroad v. FritzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Fuller v. TaborSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855
  3. Mills v. RedickNebraska Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Docking v. FrazellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  2. Moore v. MoranNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API