Legal Opinion
Wang v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 31, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2016-1963Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SIQING WANG, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:16-cv-01963 (TNM) UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Siqing Wang invested $500,000 in a U.S. business to qualify for an investor visa, but the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) declared her ineligible. The central issue was—and is still—whether proceeds from a loan are either “cash” or “indebtedness” under the regulation. Both USCIS and Ms. Wang filed motions for summary judgment. After a motions hearing,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.