Legal Opinion

Moody v. Allegheny Valley Land Trust

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 2009No. 22 WAP 2008PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GREENSPAN.

In this appeal, we hold that as long as the requirements of Section 1247(d) of the National Trails System Act are met, a railroad right-of-way is “railbanked” regardless of whether the rail operator agrees to resuscitate service. Accordingly, we affirm the Superior Court’s decision below.

Railbanking is the preservation of an easement that was previously used as a rail thoroughfare by allowing interim trail use on the right-of-way, subject to revitalization of rail service at a later date, consistent with the requirements of Section 1247(d) of the National Trails…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  3. Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. TEACHER v. KijurinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Jenkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Biery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API