Legal Opinion
Shackelford v. Riddling
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 7, 1945No. 15077PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jexkins, Presiding Justice.
1. “If the defendant calls in question by demurrer the sufficiency of the petition, and the court renders a decision holding that the petition sets forth a cause of action, so long as this decision stands unreversed the defendant is precluded from calling in question the sufficiency of the petition by oral motion to dismiss.” Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. Hutchins, 119 Ga. 504 (46 S. E. 659).
No. 15077. February 7, 1945.
2. “Where a general demurrer has been heard and adjudicated, the court will not, on a motion subsequently made to dissolve the injunction on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. Hutchins & JenkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- A. C. Alexander Lumber Co. v. BagleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Washington National Insurance v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Hill v. Wadley Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- McGinnis v. Justices of the Inferior CourtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eidson v. CheekSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Richardson v. MilikinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Griffin v. LomanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- May v. MaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Richardson v. MilikinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949