Eidson v. Cheek
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Justice.
1. “If the defendant calls in question by demurrer the sufficiency of the petition, and the court renders a decision holding that the petition sets forth a-cause of action, so long as this decision stands unreversed the defendant is precluded from calling in question the sufficiency of the petition by oral motion to dismiss,” the ruling on demurrer being res judicata. Ga. Northern Ry. Co. v. Hutchins, 119 Ga. 504 (46 S. E. 659). See also Loughridge v. City of Dalton, 166 Ga. 323 (143 S. E. 393); Kaiser v. Kaiser, 195 Ga. 774 (25 S. E. 2d 665); Shackleford v. Riddling, 198 Ga.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. Hutchins & JenkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Loughridge v. City of DaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Calhoun v. Babcock Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Patterson v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thompson v. IngramSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Dolvin v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Gilmore v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Atlanta Transit System, Inc. v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- May v. MaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1958