Machen v. Yost
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
On October 20, 1920, defendant in error entered into a contract in writing with the plaintiff in error for the purchase of certain lots of land in the District of Columbia, with improvements thereon. The contract in part provided as follows:
■ “Title to be a good record title or deposit refunded. Taxes, interest, rents, and insurance to be adjusted by calculation to date of transfer. Taxes and assessments, whether levied or not, for special improvements already made, to be paid by vendor. Examination of title, conveyancing, recording, and notary fees at the cost of the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Simpson Bros., Inc. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Baker v. Smith & Gottlieb, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Reliable Construction & Realty Co. v. Waterproofing Service, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Leigh v. HertzmarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Murray v. HimelfarbDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.