Leigh v. Hertzmark
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENSLEY, Chief Judge, Court of Appeals.
In the trial court the plaintiff sought and recovered a judgrhent against the defendants in the sum of $1,863.36.
The cause of action arose out of certain negotiations and a contract whereby the defendants agreed t,o sell to the plaintiff thirty-two lots in an addition to the City of Albuquerque for the sum of $1,-850.00 per lot. The Purchase Agreement, or Binder, dated December 28, 1962, provided that “buyer to pay $1,850.00 per lot and buyer to assume water and sewer assessments at not more than $216.84 per lot. Seller to release eight lots in a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Town of Macon v. PattyMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
- City of Clovis v. Southwestern Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. McCormick McCormick v. Phillips Petroleum CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- City of Clovis v. CrainNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Hendrich v. Walker River Irrigation DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GilbertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Leigh v. HertzmarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Mary A SuarezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2020