Legal Opinion

Leigh v. Hertzmark

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1967No. 8129PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENSLEY, Chief Judge, Court of Appeals.

In the trial court the plaintiff sought and recovered a judgrhent against the defendants in the sum of $1,863.36.

The cause of action arose out of certain negotiations and a contract whereby the defendants agreed t,o sell to the plaintiff thirty-two lots in an addition to the City of Albuquerque for the sum of $1,-850.00 per lot. The Purchase Agreement, or Binder, dated December 28, 1962, provided that “buyer to pay $1,850.00 per lot and buyer to assume water and sewer assessments at not more than $216.84 per lot. Seller to release eight lots in a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Town of Macon v. PattyMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
  2. City of Clovis v. Southwestern Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. McCormick McCormick v. Phillips Petroleum CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. City of Clovis v. CrainNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Hendrich v. Walker River Irrigation DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GilbertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Leigh v. HertzmarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Mary A SuarezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API