Legal Opinion

Kline v. Falbo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1943No. 775PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, P. J.

The action below was one for a declaratory judgment. The pleadings constitute the evidence in the case. The trial court found that defendant Earl 0. Williamson had, under the evidence, the first and best lien on the premises in question, that Harry 0. Thomson had the second best lien, and that by reason of the dormancy of the Falbo judgment the Falbos had no lien on the premises.

Appeal is prosecuted to this court on questions of law.

The parties will be designated as they were in the trial court.

The material allegations necessary to a determination of the issues involved are as follows:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knickerbocker v. SharfenakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Grohne v. English Const. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  2. Markham v. GottsegenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API