Legal Opinion

People v. Hartuniewicz

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 2011No. Docket No. 298163PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGleicher, P.J.

A jury convicted defendant Benjamin Alan Hartuniewicz of possession of ketamine, a schedule 3 controlled substance,1 in violation of MCL 333.7403(2)(b)(ii) of the controlled substances act (CSA), MCL 333.7101 et seq.2 Defendant argues that the prosecution failed to establish, as an element of the *239charged offense, that the ketamine was not “in a proportion or concentration to vitiate the potential for abuse,” because such diluted substances are “excluded” from the CSA by MCL 333.7227(1). We hold that the exclusion in MCL 333.7227(1) is not an element of a possession offense, but an affirmative…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. WolfeMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. KowalskiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. ReedMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. DupreeMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. RileyMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People of Michigan v. Vicki Renee DickinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. People of Michigan v. Richard Allen BahamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. People v. GoreeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Clark v. BrewerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  5. Hinds v. HussDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API