Legal Opinion

Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Indians v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 3, 1982No. Nos. 342-70, 343-70PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*291OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

On November 4, 1982, a motion to intervene was filed by seven individuals on their own behalf and on behalf of all other Indians of the Hoopa Valley Reservation who are plaintiffs in Jessie Short v. United States, 202 Ct.Cl. 870, 486 F.2d 561 (1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 961, 94 S.Ct. 1981, 40 L.Ed.2d 313 (1974). See Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States, 419 Ct.Cl. 492, 596 F.2d 435 (1979) and Jessie Short v. United States, Defendant and Hoopa Valley Tribe of Indians, Defendant-Intervenor, Ct.Cl. No. 102-63, decided September 23, 1981. Accompanying said motion were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Quinault Allottee Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  3. Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  4. Theophilus McCLAIN, Appellant, v. WAGNER ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. Indian Head National Bank of Nashua v. Richard Brunelle, U.S. Marshal for the District of New Hampshire, and Conproco Corporation, Ipa Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rickard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API