Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Brown v. Luebbers

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2013No. 2013-0644PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a court of appeals’ judgment dismissing a petition for a writ of procedendo to compel a trial judge to rule on various motions, including a motion to vacate an entry that had corrected an error in a sentencing entry. Appellee, Judge Jody Luebbers, has not ruled on the motions and apparently does not intend to rule on them. Appellant, Barron Brown, filed a complaint for a writ of procedendo in the First District Court of Appeals to force the judge to rule on his motions.

{¶ 2} The court of appeals dismissed the complaint, and Brown appealed to this court. Because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sherrills v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Weiss v. HooverOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Culgan v. CollierOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State ex rel. Reynolds v. BasingerOhio Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BeachOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. State v. KhamsiOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State ex rel. Quinn v. RastatterOhio Supreme Court · 2026
  4. State ex rel. Williams v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Stevens v. FleegleOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API