Legal Opinion

William Lane McGarvey v. The State of Wyoming

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2014No. S-13-0124PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice.

[T1] Appellant William McGarvey was convicted of first degree sexual assault for physically forcing a young woman to perform oral sex on him. On appeal, he alleges that his attorney was ineffective. We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] McGarvey asserts that his counsel's performance was constitutionally ineffective in the three following respects:

1. Counsel sought to introduce evidence under Wyoming's rape shield statute, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-8312 (LexisNex-is 20183), without educating himself about the proper application of that statute and the meaning of DNA evidence gathered by the State.

2.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States v. Donald Freeman OwensCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nathaniel Castellanos v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Michael Scott Carroll, II v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Scott A. GalbreathWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Moser v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Randy Ray Pickering v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API