William Lane McGarvey v. The State of Wyoming
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Justice.
[T1] Appellant William McGarvey was convicted of first degree sexual assault for physically forcing a young woman to perform oral sex on him. On appeal, he alleges that his attorney was ineffective. We affirm.
ISSUE
[¶ 2] McGarvey asserts that his counsel's performance was constitutionally ineffective in the three following respects:
1. Counsel sought to introduce evidence under Wyoming's rape shield statute, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-8312 (LexisNex-is 20183), without educating himself about the proper application of that statute and the meaning of DNA evidence gathered by the State.
2.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Donald Freeman OwensCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nathaniel Castellanos v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Michael Scott Carroll, II v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Scott A. GalbreathWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Moser v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Randy Ray Pickering v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.