Chawla v. J & L Musto Construction, Inc.

Plaintiff-Appellant (Chawla) appeals pursuant to Dist/Mun.Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 8A, from a denial of her motion to vacate a judgment of dismissal.1 The dismissal, in favor of Defendant-Appellee (Musto), was entered in accordance with Mass. R. Civ. P, Rule 33(a), for Chawla’s failure to answer interrogatories.

The summary of undisputed facts offered pursuant to Rule 8A is as follows. On February 13,2002, Chawla sued for negligence arising out of an auto accident Musto properly served Chawla with interrogatories on March 25, 2002. The interrogatories were not answered. On August 29, 2002, Musto…