Legal Opinion
Brown Bag-Filling Mach. Co. v. Drohen
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York
Decided August 12, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
This is an action to enjoin the infringement of two United States letters patent owned by complainant, No. 539,171, issued to Henry H. Cummings, dated May 14,1895, and No. 578,133, issued to Benjamin E. Brown, dated March 2, 1897. The earlier patent has 81 claims, and relates to automatic machines for filling paper bags with seed or other fine material. The later patent relates to a folding mechanism for use in connection with bag-filling apparatus such as shown in the Cummings patent, but, according to the specification, it may be used on other forms of-bag-filling…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Los Angeles Art Organ Co. v. Æolian Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
- Jensen-Salsbery Laboratories, Inc. v. Salt Lake Stamp Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Page Mach. Co. v. DowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
- Hall Signal Co. v. General Ry. Signal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1908