Gibson v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Lonoke Chancery Court. Jesse C. Hart, Judge. . There can be no fraudulent conveyance of a homestead. 43 Ark. 429; 57 Ark. 242; 52 Ark. 493; 52 Ark. 102; 33 Ark. 454, 762. The appellant is not entitled to have the conveyance set aside. 11 Ark. 411, 716; 52 Ark. 171, 389; Kirby’s Dig. § 3898; 65 Ark. 373; 66 Ark. 382; 71 Ark. 207; 21 111. 445; 68 Mo. 388; 14 How. 519; 69 Mo. 415; 48 Ark. 539. No decree should have been rendered against Helen M. Barrett. 39 Cal.…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Lonoke Chancery Court. Jesse C. Hart, Judge. . There can be no fraudulent conveyance of a homestead. 43 Ark. 429; 57 Ark. 242; 52 Ark. 493; 52 Ark. 102; 33 Ark. 454, 762. The appellant is not entitled to have the conveyance set aside. 11 Ark. 411, 716; 52 Ark. 171, 389; Kirby’s Dig. § 3898; 65 Ark. 373; 66 Ark. 382; 71 Ark. 207; 21 111. 445; 68 Mo. 388; 14 How. 519; 69 Mo. 415; 48 Ark. 539. No decree should have been rendered against Helen M. Barrett. 39 Cal. 688; .11 111. 31; 94 Ind. 268; 60 Ind. 245; 93 Ind. 62; 73 N. C. 464. Refusal to annul the conveyance made to Martha C.…
1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.
A. B. Barrett purchased one hundred and sixty acres of land, and caused the same to be conveyed to his wife, Helen M. Barrett. They occupied 'the same as a homestead until the death of the wife, and A. B. Barrett thereafter continued to occupy the land in the same manner. A short time before her death, and while she was occupying it as a homestead, Mrs. Barrett conveyed eighty acres of the land to her daughter, Martha C. Thompson, and the remainder to her husband. At the time of the purchase by the husband and of the conveyance by the wife they were much in debt. Their creditors brought this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pipkin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
- Carmack v. LovettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Stanley v. SnyderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Blythe v. JettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Bogan v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re CarlDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1941
- South Omaha National Bank v. BoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Cannon v. FerrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Sulcer v. Northwestern National Ins.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1978