Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Baker

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 11, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-2919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

OBERDORFER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Dr. Paul Kurtz, is a professor of philosophy and a secular humanist. Defendants are the Secretary of the Treasury, the Treasurer of thé United States, the Chaplain of the House and the Chaplain of the Senate.

Plaintiff brings this suit requesting a permanent injunction to restrain all present and future chaplains of the United States Senate and House of Representatives, while acting in their official capacity, from disparaging the beliefs of nontheists, and a declaration that the making of such remarks by a Senate or House chaplain is…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boehner v. McDermottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  2. United States v. Van AvermaetDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API