Legal Opinion

Hardebeck v. Hardebeck

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 2009No. 48A04-0904-CV-212PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Anna Mae Hardebeck ("Wife") appeals from the dissolution decree which ended her marriage to James A. Hardebeck ("Husband"). She raises the following issues for review:

1. Whether the dissolution court abused its discretion when it adopted the proposed findings of fact and conclusions thereon that had been tendered by Husband.

*6962, Whether the dissolution court abused its discretion when it found that Wife had dissipated marital assets.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Husband and Wife were married on August 18, 1965. Each party had children from…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Prowell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Cook v. Whitsell-ShermanIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. A.F. v. Marion County Office of Family & ChildrenIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Saylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Daylene M. (Atchison) Coleman v. Scott A. AtchisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Marion County Auditor v. Sawmill Creek, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Dana L. Smith v. James L. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Hardebeck v. HardebeckIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. In Re The Guardianship of J.M.: Christina M. Martin (Kibalko) v. William P. Hitch and Georgia L. HitchIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API