McKissick v. R. Connelly Jewelers, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the trial judge erred, first, in failing to find that the defendant had a duty either to carry insurance to protect plaintiff’s property or to inform plaintiff there was no such insurance, and, second, in failing to find defendant negligent in caring for plaintiff’s property. We find no error in either respect.
Defendant’s possession of plaintiff’s rings was that of a bailee under a bailment for the mutual benefit of the bailor and the bailee; “and in such case the duty of the bailee is to exercise due care and his liability depends upon the presence or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beck v. Wilkins-Ricks Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Millers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois v. Atkinson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Morgan v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Swain v. Twin City Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- M. B. Haynes Electric Corp. v. Justice Aero Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilson v. Burch Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Becker v. N.C. Dept. of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Barnes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003