Legal Opinion

Heinmiller v. Winston Bros.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 12, 1906PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal, from Bremer District Gourt.— Hon. J. F. Clyde, ■Judge. • Suit to recover damages for personal injuries. Trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Tbe defendants appeal.—

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwin, J.—

In June, 1902, the defendants were en-. gaged in deepening a cut for the Chicago Great Western Railway 'Company on its line of railway which had been in use for many years. They used in said work a steam shovel described as being fifty-five feet long, twelve feet high, with a smokestack extending six feet above the car, and with a boom twenty-four or twenty-five feet high. This cut was spanned near its center by a public highway bridge, the floor of which was from twenty-eight to thirty feet above the bottom of the cut. At the precise time that the plaintiff received the injury…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. House v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  2. Hudson v. C., & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Bemis v. TempleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  4. Moreland v. Mitchell CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  5. Hawley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Delfs v. DunsheeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Kirchoff v. Hohnsbehn Creamery Supply Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. King v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Lehman ex rel. Lehman v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Crawford v. Emerson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API