Heinmiller v. Winston Bros.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal, from Bremer District Gourt.— Hon. J. F. Clyde, ■Judge. • Suit to recover damages for personal injuries. Trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Tbe defendants appeal.—
1Opinion of the Court
Sherwin, J.—
In June, 1902, the defendants were en-. gaged in deepening a cut for the Chicago Great Western Railway 'Company on its line of railway which had been in use for many years. They used in said work a steam shovel described as being fifty-five feet long, twelve feet high, with a smokestack extending six feet above the car, and with a boom twenty-four or twenty-five feet high. This cut was spanned near its center by a public highway bridge, the floor of which was from twenty-eight to thirty feet above the bottom of the cut. At the precise time that the plaintiff received the injury…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- House v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
- Hudson v. C., & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Bemis v. TempleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Moreland v. Mitchell CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Hawley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Delfs v. DunsheeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Kirchoff v. Hohnsbehn Creamery Supply Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- King v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Lehman ex rel. Lehman v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Crawford v. Emerson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.