Legal Opinion

United States v. Rankin

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1998No. Crim. 88-150-01PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■MEMORANDUM

CAHN, Chief Judge.

Before the court are a petition and two motions by Defendant Kevin J. Rankin (“Rankin”), who is proceeding pro se. Rankin petitions the court for coram nobis relief. In addition, Rankin moves the court to reassign this case outside the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and to disqualify the U.S. Attorney’s Office for this district, particularly Assistant U.S. Attorney Louis R. Pichini (“Pichini”), from this case. For the reasons that follow, the court denies the petition and the motions.

I. BACKGROUND

The long history of this case, and of a related criminal matter…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Trenkler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  2. Sawyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Richey v. HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Bakhtiari v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API