Littell v. Saulsberry
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered April 5, 1905, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a material-man’s lien.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
This action was instituted by the respondent, O. B. Littell, against the appellants George W. Saulsberry *551and L. 0. Saulsberry, bis wife, to foreclose a materialman’s lien on certain of their community real estate in the city of Seattle. Early in June, 1904, appellant George W. Saulsberry telephoned to the Western Mill Factory that he desired to contract for the purchase of all lumber necessary to complete a house he was then building. Respondent, O. B. Littell, doing business as the Western Mill Factory, forthwith went to said house and after inspecting the same and having a conference with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fitch v. ApplegateWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Huttig Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. Denny Hotel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
- Griffith v. MaxwellWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Ivall v. WillisWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Bently v. Port Townsend Hotel & Improvement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coleman v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Cascaden v. WimbishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Harris v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Teufel v. WienirWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Lee v. WillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.