Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lawson v. Ford Motor Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1987No. 85-649Published

1DissentBoslaugh, J.

The statute involved in this case, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-213 (Reissue 1979), dates back to territorial days. It was a part of the Code of Civil Procedure adopted in 1866. See Rev. Stat. tit. II, § 17 (1866). It has existed in substantially its present form since that time. Its purpose is to extend the time in which a person under disability may bring certain actions. It provides that such a person may bring such an action “within the respective times limited by this chapter after such disability shall be removed....” (Emphasis supplied.)

The disability we are concerned with in this case is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MacKu by and Through MacKu v. Drackett Prod. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. CarlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Tamara Hatfield, by Her Father and Next Friend, Samuel Hatfield v. Bishop Clarkson Memorial Hospital, a Nebraska Corporation, John Harold GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. Holmes v. MasonNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Albers v. KozeluhNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API