Legal Opinion

McQueen v. City of Elkhart

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1896No. 2,027PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The appellant, who was the plaintiff below, -sued to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received by her from a fall on one of the streets of the city of Elkhart. The cause was tried by the court, a special finding of facts made with conclusions of law thereon. The exceptions reserved to the conclusions of law upon the facts found present the only questions for review on this appeal.

The facts found by the court, with the conclusions of law thereon, are as follows:

£ ‘ 1st. The defendant is, and at the time of the filing of the complaint in this cause, and on the 25th day…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cummins v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. City of Indianapolis v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Leeds v. City of RichmondIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. GreeneIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Lyon v. City of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Muncie v. HeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Cowin v. Sears-Roebuck and Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. City of Linton v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Ewald v. City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. City of Michigan City v. RudolphIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API