Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Dixon

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 15, 1940No. 3149PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.

The parties are all residents of this state and so was the decedent, but the automobile accident in which the latter was fatally injured occurred in Maine. Without objection or exception this action was tried under the death statute of that state. Maine Revised Statutes, (1930), c. 101, ss. 9, 10, as amended by Maine Acts and Resolves 1933, c. 113. Under the circumstances disclosed the submission to the jury of both the issue of liability and that of damages under the statute of Maine cited above was proper. Hill v. Railroad, 77 N. H. 151; Marshall v. Railroad, 81 N. H. 548; Am. Law Inst.,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McKay v. New England Dredging Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
  2. Curran v. Lewiston, Augusta & Waterville Street Railway Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  3. Carrier v. BornsteinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  4. Graffam v. Saco Grange Patrons of Husbandry, No. 53Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  5. Bowley v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCullough v. McTavishAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Ware v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API