Lattimore v. Gray
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KENESHA LATTIMORE, ) on behalf of President ) Joe Biden and the American People, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 24-cv-03347 (UNA) ) v. ) ) CHUCK GRAY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) Memorandum Opinion Plaintiff has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 2. The Court grants Plaintiff’s IFP application. For the reasons below, the Court dismisses this action for failure to state a claim and as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)–(ii). Plaintiff sues…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tooley v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- In Re: CheneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Keith Thomas v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.