Braatelien v. Burns

This action was brought to recover on a promissory note executed by the defendants Burns. Upon application of Haugland the court issued an order directed to the plaintiff to show cause why Haugland should not be permitted to intervene. Haugland entitled his application “Petition to Inter-plead.” With it he submitted a “Proposed Answer.” In support of the application he also submitted a showing of the facts on which he predicated it. The court treated the application as one for leave to intervene made pursuant to the provisions 5f § 7413, Comp Laws 1913 (1943 Eev Code, §§ 28-0219, 28-0220) and…