Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 24, 1902PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Sac District Oourt. — Hon. S. M. Elwood, Judge. This is an appeal from a condemnation proceeding in which plaintiff was awarded damages in the district court in the sum of $290. The sheriff’s jury awarded him $300, and he appeals from the judgment of the district court.—

1Opinion of the Court

Deemer D. J . —

The defendant made application to the sheriff of Sac county for the appointment of commissioners to assess the damages to the Northwest \ of the Northwest i of section 26, township 89, in said county, by reason of the appropriation of a right of way through said land. Notice of the application was given to plaintiff, Hoyt, and to one Rowlee, his tenant, and commissioners were appointed pursuant to the application, who met, and awarded plaintiff the sum of $300, and the tenant, Row-lee, $25. Both plaintiff and Rowlee appealed from the award to the district cpurt, where a trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Stevens v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Potts v. Penn. S. V. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Johnson v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Peck v. Superior Short Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fowle v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Ege v. BornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. State v. BevinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Hubbell v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Clark v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API