Legal Opinion

United States v. Virgil F. Kanan, Donald R. Elbel, George M. Hill, R. E. Wolfe, Martin Breitenbach and James F. Byrne

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 4, 1965No. 19395_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal by the United States from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona entered on September 24, 1963, dismissing an indictment on the ground that all the evidence before the grand jury had been illegally obtained. Appellant asserts this court possesses jurisdiction to entertain this appeal under the Criminal Appeals Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3731. The relevant portion of that section reads as follows:

“An appeal may be taken by and on behalf of the United States from the district courts to a court of appeals in all criminal cases, in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. Mack S. TaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Donald R. Elbel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. United States v. Nicholas DistefanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. People v. GrossmanNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. District of Columbia v. PerryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. District of Columbia v. PerryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API