State ex rel. Biddle v. Birden
Indiana Supreme Court
From Tipton Circuit Court; James M. Purvis, Judge. Action by the State of Indiana, on the relation of James Biddle and others, against John C. Birden, trustee. From a judgment for the defendant, the relators appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.
1. The only error properly assigned in this appeal is based upon the overruling of appellants’ motion for a new trial. Neither the motion for new trial, nor the substance thereof, is set out in appellants’ original brief, and all questions sought to be presented thereby are therefore waived. Robbins v. Bank (1917), 186 Ind. 573, 117 N. E. 562; Pugh v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. (1915), 184 Ind. 350, 110 N. E. 193.
2. After appellants’ attention was called to the defects in their original brief by appellee’s answer brief, they made no attempt to amend their brief, but merely -inserted the omitted…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gates v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Pugh v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Waters v. DelagrangeIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Robbins v. Bank of Starke CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
- Fox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Epstein v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
- Hatton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
- Peel v. OverstreetIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Whitesell v. MetskerIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Interstate Public Service Co. v. Moore, Admx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.