Legal Opinion

Leibfried v. Horn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 1928No. Appeal, 220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

In answer to plaintiff’s statement of claim, defendant filed an affidavit of defense in lieu of demurrer. On July-13, 1927, the court below made the following order: “It is adjudged that plaintiffs have not set out a good cause of action.” Plaintiffs petitioned for reargument, and this was granted November 16, 1927. On January 23d, the court below ruled: “after reargument we adhere to our opinion that the statement filed does not set out a good cause of action.” Plaintiff appealed to us from this order. Appellee has moved to quash, on the grounds that the only appealable order-was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barlott v. ForneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. American Trust Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Henry's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Smith v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. BeattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Bishoff v. FehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Trestrail v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Constable's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. McClelland v. West Penn Appliance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API