Legal Opinion

Smith v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1926No. 102PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff sued under the Federal Employers’ Liability Acts to recover for personal injuries. Defendant filed an affidavit of defense, in the nature of a demurrer, to the effect that plaintiff’s statement of claim showed Ms cause of action to be one “which is not within the Federal Employers’ Liability Acts as interpreted by the Supreme Court of the United States.” On April 13, 1925, the court below entered the following order: “The affidavit of defense raising questions of law is sustained.” The docket entries of the court below show that, on October 14, 1925, plaintiff, treating…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Ahrens v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Watkins v. NeffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Lewis v. BeattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Bishoff v. FehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API