Legal Opinion

State v. Karcz

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 4, 1976No. 170-75, 217-75PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

These two cases, consolidated below for purposes of appeal, arise from the same factual situation and present, by means of reports by agreement pursuant to V.R.A.P. 5(a) following denials of defendants’ motions to suppress at the omnibus hearings, questions relating to the admissibility of certain evidence obtained in the process of an allegedly unlawful search. The orders reporting the cases here properly contain, pursuant to V.R.A.P. 5(a), the district judges’ opinions that the questions reported are of sufficient importance and doubt to justify appeal before final judgment and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Powers v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
  2. State v. BlondinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  3. Miller Automobile Company v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BadgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. Clymer v. WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. State v. WetherbeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. State v. Kory L. GeorgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  5. State v. Wesley Haynes, Tristan Harris and Dennis MagoonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API