Legal Opinion

Abrevaya v. Palace Theatre & Realty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The plaintiffs are daughter and parent. The infant plaintiff with her father, the other plaintiff, were in attendance as paying patrons- at a performance at the Palace Theatre, operated by the defendant. One of the acts on stage was “ Bandy’s Greyhounds & Monkeys”. During the course of the performance, one of Bandy’s monkeys, riding on a greyhound, suddenly left his perch, went beyond the proscenium arch, and attacked the infant plaintiff, sitting in an orchestra loge. The plaintiffs sue for damages for the resulting personal injuries and medical expense. The relevant substantive allegations…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spring Co. v. EdgarSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Mangrelli v. Italian LineNew York Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carter v. Metro North AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Pate v. YeagerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Carter v. Metro North AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API